Skip to main content


Journal Issues

Factors Affecting the Productivity of the Construction Industry in Ernakulam
Ajith Kumar .K
Pages: 1-10 | First Published: 05 Apr 2020
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
Building industry faces difficulties with respect to profitability related issues and the issues are commonly connected with work proficiency. Numerous development organizations have confronted constant issues, for example, lacking wellbeing, unsatisfactory working conditions and inadequate effectiveness. These issues have been portrayed as components influencing the effectiveness of development and influencing the yield of the organization. The objective of this examination is to recognize factors impacting development profitability in Ernakulum locale dependent on polls gave to laborers and representatives. At that point, the survey examination is performed by esteem file and positions the factors as indicated by the worth list. This paper classifies efficiency factors into four gatherings: 1.safety, 2.quality, 3.man force factors, 4.management variables, 5. Spot, materials and factor-related assets, 6. Configuration related elements and 7.external variables. The polls are flowed to top administration and mid-level administration. This exploration will be created as an underlying examination of Ernakulum development industries more top to bottom investigation.


Keywords:Factors affecting Productivity, Productivity Lose in construction industry.

References
1. A.A. Attar, A.K Gupta, & D.B. Desai (2012), ‘A study of various factors affecting labour productivity and methods
to improve it.’ IOSR-JMCE.,vol. 18, pp.11-14.
2. Abdulaziz M. Jarkas & Camille G. Bitar (2012), ‘Factors Affecting Construction Labour Productivity in Kuwait.’
J.Constr.Eng.Manage.,vol. 138, no.7, pp. 811-820
3. Abdul Kadir, W.P. Lee, S.M.Sapuan & A.A.A. Ali (2005), ‘ Factors affecting construction labour productivity for
Malaysian residential projects.’ Structural survey, vol. 23, no.1, pp.42-54.
4. Sudharsan, N,& Sivalingam, K. (2019). Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in
construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3435–3438.
5. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2016). Experimental Investigations on the Properties of Coal-Ash Brick Units as
Green Building Materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 36(6), 318–325.
6. Adna Enshassi, Sherif Mohamed, Ziad Abu Mustafa & Peter Eduard Mayer (2007). ‘Factors Affecting Labour
Productivity in Building Projects in the Gaza strip.’ J.Civil.Eng.Manage., vol. 13, no.4, pp.245-254.
7. Sudharsan, N, & Saravanaganesh, S. (2019). Feasibility studies on waste glass powder. International Journal of
Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 1644–1647.

8. Arun Makulsawatudom & Margaret Emsley, (2001), ‘Factors affecting the productivity of the construction
industry in Thaliland:The project managers perception’, Association of Researchers in Construction Manage., vol.
1, pp. 281-290.
9. A.Soekiman, K.S.Pribadi, B.W.Soemardi,& R.D Wirahadikusumah (2011), ‘Factors relating to labour productivity
affecting the project schedule performance in Indonesia.’Science Direct., vol. 14, pp.865-873
10. Mostafa E.Shehata & Khaled M.El-Gohary (2012), ‘Towards improving construction labour productivity and
projects performance .’Alexandria Engineering Journal.,vol.50, pp.321-330.
11. Richard L.Tucker (1986),‘Management of construction productivity’,J.Constr. Eng.manage.,ASCE, vol.2, no.3,
pp.188-200.
12. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2014). Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall
elements. Journal of Structural Engineering (India), 41(4), 410–419.
13. N. Sudharsan, T. Palanisamy, S. C. Yaragal, (2018), Environmental sustainability of waste glass as a valuable
construction material - A critical review. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24 pp. S331–S338.
14. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2013). Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond
ash. Pollution Research, 32(2), 405–409.

Strength and Durability Test on Partial Replacement of Cement by Glass Powder in Self- Compacting Concrete
Aravindan K
Pages: 11-15 | First Published: 05 Apr 2020
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
Self-compacting solid that can stream under its own weight and complete the shape work, even within the sight of thick
support, without requiring any vibration while saving homogeneity. ). SCC can likewise be utilized in circumstances where
mechanical compaction for new cement is troublesome or difficult to utilize, for example, submerged cementing,
projecting in-situ heap establishments, machine bases and sections or dividers with clogged fortification The piece of SCC
is like that of ordinary cement but to accomplish self-stream admixtures, for example, fly debris, glass filler, calcareous
powder, The various properties of the materials in the exploratory program were resolved. Glass Powders qualities and
the benefits of utilizing them with concrete were examined. An exhaustive investigation on glass powder concrete was
likewise directed. Concrete will be supplanted by 5 percent, 10%, 15 percent, 20%, 25 percent, concrete weight. The
solid shapes, chambers and crystals were projected 150x150x150 mm, 150 mm x 300mmhigh, 700x150x150 mm. Utilizing
swamp cone test, super plasticizer will be included for improved usefulness and ideal measurements was determined.
Distinctive quality and continuance tests will be performed.

References 
1. Jin Tao, Yong Yuan and Luc Taerwe, Compressive Strength of Self Compacting Concrete during High Temperature
Exposure ASCE
2. M.A Hossain and M.Lachemi,ǁBond Behaviour of SCC with Mineral and Chemical Admixturesǁ Cement and
Concrete Research
3. Sudharsan, N, & Saravanaganesh, S. (2019). Feasibility studies on waste glass powder. International Journal of
Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 1644–1647.
4. M.Valcuendeand C.parra―Natural Carbonation of Self Compacting Concrete Construction and Building
Materials
5. Philippe Turcry, Ahmed and Khalil, Cracking Tendency of Self Compacting Concrete Subjected to Restrained
Shrinkage ASCE
6. YoungHoonKimandMaryBeth,ǁShearCharacteristicsandDesignforHighStrength Self Compacting Concrete―ASCE
7. J.MKhatib―PerformanceofSelfCompactingConcretecontainingFlyashConstruction and Building Materials
8. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2013). Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond
ash. Pollution Research, 32(2), 405–409.
9. Sudharsan, N., & Palanisamy, T. (2018). A comprehensive study on potential use of waste materials in brick for
sustainable development. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24, S339–S343.
10. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2014). Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall elements. Journal
of Structural Engineering (India), 41(4), 410–419.
11. Sudharsan, N,& Sivalingam, K. (2019). Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in
construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3435–3438.
12. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2016). Experimental Investigations on the Properties of Coal-Ash Brick Units as
Green Building Materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 36(6), 318–325.
13. N. Sudharsan, T. Palanisamy, S. C. Yaragal, (2018), Environmental sustainability of waste glass as a valuable
construction material - A critical review. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24 pp. S331–S338.

Project Planning & Scheduling
Sudha P B
Pages: 16-20 | First Published: 05 Apr 2020
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
Broad Planning is a general concept that sets a simple road map to a destination. The word was used at various levels to imply different items. Planning involves splitting the project into definable, observable and recognizable tasks / activities and then defining the interdependencies between them. These plans include four main steps: breakdown of the project's work items into tasks. Identifying the correct sequence to perform the operations. Representing events. Estimating individual activities' resources , time, and expense. The planning team needs rigorous effort. A planner should know the various categories of work and the language and information used in general practise. Planning tem should also seek professional opinion including real building experience. This helps create a practical strategy and later on-site prevent issues.

Reference
1. “Basic Introduction to Project Planning & Scheduling” by Jackie Gilliland emphasis - which the Project planning,
scheduling and control and project management is explained in Detail.
2. “Project Planning & Scheduling” by Gregory T Haugan did the Studies and makes all planning methods and tools
available to project managers at all levels easy to understand... and use.
3. “Project Planning, Scheduling & Control” by James P Lewis - Thoroughly updated to encompass the tremendous
technological and workplace changes of the past decade--with exceptional illustrations and graphics to illuminate key
points--this clearly written, applications-oriented project management blueprint reveals easy-to-follow.
4. “Planning, Scheduling , Monitoring & Control” by Simon Addy manin his book offers practical guidance on all planning
aspects of preparing to undertake a project, executing a project, controlling its delivery to budget, time and quality,
and delivering it safely.
5. “Construction Planning& Scheduling” by Andrew Baldwin & David Bordoli -presents the key issues of planning and
programming in scheduling in a clear, concise and practical way.
6. “Construction Project Scheduling & Control” by Saleh A Mubarak – The study provides a comprehensive examination
of the analytical methods used to devise a reasonable, efficient, and successful schedule for construction projects of all
sizes.
7. “ Maintenance , Planning, Coordination & Scheduling” by Don Nyman & Joel Levitt - Based on real-world experience
this invaluable guide and reference tells the whole story of maintenance planning from beginning to end in a concise
and easy-to-follow manner.
8. “Project Scope Management “by Jamal Moustafaev describes how to elicit, document, and manage requirements to
control project scope creep. It also explains how to manage project stakeholders to minimize the risk of an evergrowing
list of user requirements.
9. “ Effective Work Breakdown Structures “By Dr. Gregory T. Haugan clearly states that WBS is a foundational building
block to initiating, planning, executing, and monitoring and controlling processes used to manage projects. Resource
Breakdown Structure (RBS) describes the project's resource organization, and can be used with the WBS to define
work package assignments.
10. “ Practice Standard for Scheduling” By Project Management Institute provides the latest thinking regarding good and
accepted practices in the area of scheduling for a project. In this new edition of the practice standard, you will learn
to identify the elements of a good schedule model, its purpose, use, and benefits.

Determination of Mechanical Properties of Industrial Ash Brick
Vidhya K, Thamarai selvan R,
Pages: 21-27 | First Published: 05 Apr 2020
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
Standard sort mud blocks need to make more topsoil domains, and there is a lousy situation for headway. Materials from "Fly Ash and Pond Ash" are used to decide the above issue and limit discharges. Sand is displaced by quarry dust in light of worth thoughts. Wads of fly particles, now and again supplanted by lake particles and sand, are replaced by quarry dust in this examination. Properties of the squares with coal debris.

Keywords: 

Pondash, fly ash, quarry mud, power of compression, water absorption, efflorescence, density of weight

 

References
1. A. Ghosh, (2010), Compaction characteristics and bearing ratio of pond ash stabilized with lime and
phosphogypsum. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 22, 343–351.
2. Henry Liu, Shankha K Banerji, William J Burkett & Jesse VanEngelenhoven 2009, ‘Environmental properties of fly ash
bricks’, World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, Lexington, USA, http://www.flyash.info/
3. N. Sudharsan, T. Palanisamy, S. C. Yaragal, Environmental sustainability of waste glass as a valuable construction
material - A critical review. Ecology, Environment and Conservation. 24 (2018), pp. S331–S338.
4. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2014). Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall elements. Journal of
Structural Engineering (India), 41(4), 410–419.

5. Mohamad, G., Lourenço, P. B., & Roman, H. R. (2007). Mechanics of hollow concrete block masonry prisms under
compression: Review and prospects. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29(3), 181–192.
6. Rangawala, S.C. 2012, “Engineering materials” published by Charotar Publishing House, Anand.
7. Sudharsan, N., & Saravanaganesh, S. (2019). Feasibility studies on waste glass powder. International Journal of Innovative
Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 1644–1647.
8. Pandey, P. K., & Agrawal, R. K. (2002). Utilization of mixed pond ash in integrated steel plant for manufacturing
superior quality bricks. Bulletin of Materials Science, 25(5), 443–447.
9. Rafat Siddique 2003, ‘Effect of fine aggregate replacement with class F fly ash on the mechanical properties of
concrete’, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 33, pp. 539-547.
10. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2013). Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond ash. Pollution
Research, 32(2), 405–409.
11. Gumaste, K. S., Rao, K. S. N., Reddy, B. V. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2007). Strength and elasticity of brick masonry prisms
and wallettes under compression. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 40(2), 241–253.
12. Kaushik, H. B., Rai, D. C., & Jain, S. K. (2007). Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial
compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(9), 728–739.
13. Sarangapani, G., Venkatarama Reddy, B. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2005). Brick-mortar bond and masonry compressive
strength. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 17(2), 229–237.
14. Sudharsan, N., & Palanisamy, T. (2018). A comprehensive study on potential use of waste materials in brick for
sustainable development. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24, S339–S343.
15. Santhakumar, A. R. 2007, “Concrete Technology (theory and practice)”, published by Oxford University Press-New
Delhi.
16. Xiao, J., & Wang, C. (2012). Seismic test on a damaged structure with recycled concrete blocks. In Key Engineering
Materials (Vol. 517, pp. 528–535).
17. Praburanganathan, S., & Chithra, S. (2020). Synergy of waste glass powder and waste rubber: A research on loading,
perseverance and morphological features of unburnt fly-ash-based masonry units. Materiali in Tehnologije, 54(1), 99–
106.
18. Ghosh, A. (2010). Compaction characteristics and bearing ratio of pond ash stabilized with lime and
phosphogypsum. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(4), 343–351.
19. Bharathi Ganesh, Sharada Bai, H & Nagendra, R 2011, ‘Effective utilization of pond ash for sustainable constructionneed
of the hour’, International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering, vol.4, no. 6, pp. 151-154.
20. Sarkar, R., Singh, N., & Das, S. K. (2007). Effect of addition of pond ash and fly ash on properties of ash-clay burnt
bricks. Waste Management and Research, 25(6), 566–571.
21. Goñi, S., Lorenzo, M. P., & Sagrera, J. L. (1994). Durability of hydrated portland cement with copper slag addition in
NaCl + Na2SO4 medium. Cement and Concrete Research, 24(8), 1403–1412.
22. Goñi, S., Guerrero, A., & Hernández, M. S. (2001). Spanish LLW and MLW disposal: Durability of cemented materials
in (Na, K)Cl simulated radioactive liquid waste. Waste Management, 21(1), 69–77.
23. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2016). Experimental Investigations on the Properties of Coal-Ash Brick Units as Green
Building Materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 36(6), 318–325.
24. Kumar, S. (2002). A perspective study on fly ash-lime-gypsum bricks and hollow blocks for low cost housing
development. Construction and Building Materials, 16(8), 519–525.
25. Singh, M., & Garg, M. (1995). Phosphogypsum - Fly ash cementitious binder - Its hydration and strength
development. Cement and Concrete Research, 25(4), 752–758.
26. Huang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2011). A binder of phosphogypsum-ground granulated blast furnace slag-ordinary portland
cement. Journal Wuhan University of Technology, Materials Science Edition, 26(3), 548–551.
27. Singh, M., & Garg, M. (1999). Cementitious binder from fly ash and other industrial wastes. Cement and Concrete
Research, 29(3), 309–314.
28. Sudharsan, N., & Sivalingam, K. (2019). Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in
construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3435–3438.
29. Guerrero, A., Hernandez, M. S., & Goni, S. (2000). The role of the fly ash pozzolanic activity in simulated sulphate
radioactive liquid waste. Waste Management, 20(1), 51–58.
30. Special Committee for Implementation of science and Technology Projects. (SCIP).
31. IS: 3495 (Part 1, 2 and 3)-1992, Methods of tests of Burnt Clay Building Bricks Specification, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi.
32. Gaurav Kantilal Patel & Jayeshkumar pitroda 2013, ‘Assessment of natural sand and pond ash in Indian context’,
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 4287-4291.

Strength Assessment and Restoration of RC Structures by Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
G.Buvanesan, Vidhya K
Pages: 28-34 | First Published: 05 Apr 2020
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

References
1. AntonellaGuida, AntonellaPagliuca & Alessandro Tranquillino Minerva, 2012, “A Non-Invasive Technique for
Qualifying the Reinforced Concrete Structure”, International Journal of Geophysics, Vol.10, pp.1-9.
2. FadhluhartiniMuftah, 2012, “Pulse Velocity and Rebound Hammer Test on Reinforced concrete slab in the
Former Civil Engineering Laboratory”, Proceedings of Sixth International Symposium on Advances in Science
and Technology, Malaysia, pp.1-9.
3. J. HOLA, K. SCHABOWICZ, 2010, “State-of-The-Art Non- Destructive Methods for Diagnostic Testing of
Building Structures” –anticipated development trends. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Wrolaw,
Poland, Vol.10, no.3, pp. 3-18.
4. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2014). Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall
elements. Journal of Structural Engineering (India), 41(4), 410–419.
5. Sudharsan, N., & Palanisamy, T. (2018). A comprehensive study on potential use of waste materials in brick for

sustainable development. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24, S339–S343.
6. M. Z. Jumaat, M. H. Kabir and M.Obaydullah, 2006, “A Review of the Repair of Reinforced Concrete Beams”,
Journal of Applied Science Research, Vol.2, no.6, pp.317-326.
7. Mahdi Shariati, 2011, “Assessing the strength of reinforced concrete structures through Ultrasonic Pulse
Velocity and Schmidt Rebound Hammer tests”, Scientific Research and Essays, Vol.6,no.1, pp. 213-220.
8. M. J. Monteiro, N. J. Pathak, 2011, “Structural Soundness of Building”. International journal of Earth Sciences
and Engineering, Vol.4, no.06, pp.677-680.
9. Sudharsan, N,& Sivalingam, K. (2019). Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in
construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3435–3438.
10. Nicholas J, Carino, 1999, “Non destructive Techniques to investigate Corrosion status in Concrete Structures”.
Journal of performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol.13, no.3, pp.96-105.
11. Peter C. Chang, Alison Flatau and S. C. Liu, 2008, “Review Paper Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure”,
Structural Health Monitoring, Vol-2, no.3, pp.257-267.
12. Rajan L. Wankhade, Amarsinh B. Landage, 2013, “Non- destructive Testing of Concrete Structures in Karad
Region”, Procedia Engineering, Vol.51, pp.8-18.
13. Sanjeev Kumar Verma, Sudhir Singh Bhadauria and SaleemAkhtar, 2013, “Review of Non Destructive Testing
for Condition Monitoring of Concrete Structures”, Journal of Construction Engineering, Vol.10, pp.1-11.
14. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2013). Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond
ash. Pollution Research, 32(2), 405–409.
15. Sudharsan, N., & Grant, B. C. J. (2018). Comparison of static response of laced reinforced concrete beams
with conventional reinforced concrete beams by numerical investigations. International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 700–704
16. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2016). Experimental Investigations on the Properties of Coal-Ash Brick Units as
Green Building Materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 36(6), 318–325.

Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement by Metakaolin in Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete
Karthik Prabu .P
Pages: 35-41 | First Published: 05 Apr 2020
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
Concrete is a sufficiently fragile material when introduced to standard loads and effect loads. The adaptability of cement is around one 10th of its compressive quality. As requirements are for these qualities, legitimate dependable individuals couldn't keep uploads and adaptable loads that happened on solid bars and pieces. Trustworthy individuals are fortified with consistent continuing bars to withstand flexible squares and make up for the nonappearance of flexibility and quality. The presentation of strands is consistently taken as a reaction to stirring up its flexural and inflexible nature. Fiber braced cement (FRC) is concrete made of concrete concretes, totals, and discrete stimulating fiber. Strands appropriate for propping concrete have been passed on from steel, glass, and ordinary polymers (created filaments). Exactly when substantial parts, oneself emphatically masterminded strands begin working, get break headway and causing, and improve quality and pliability.

References
1. IS 456: 2000, “Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete”,Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
2. IS 383: 1970, “Specification for Coarse aggregate and Fine aggregate from Natural Sources for Concrete”,
Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi
3. Ronald F. Zollo, “Fiber-reinforced Concrete: an Overview after 30 Years of Development”, Cement & Concrete Composite, Vol. 19, 107-122
4. P.S. Song, S. Hwang and B.C. Sheu, “Strength properties of nylon- and polyester fiber- reinforced
concretes”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 35,1546-1550
5. N. Sudharsan, T. Palanisamy, S. C. Yaragal, (2018), Environmental sustainability of waste glass as a valuable
construction material - A critical review. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24 pp. S331–S338.
6. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2014). Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall
elements. Journal of Structural Engineering (India), 41(4), 410–419.
7. Banthia N. and Dubey A., Measurement of flexural Toughness of Fibre- Reinforced Concrete Using
Technique – Part 2: Performance of various Composites, ACI Materials Journal, Volume 97, Number 1.
8. Sudharsan, N., & Palanisamy, T. (2018). A comprehensive study on potential use of waste materials in brick
for sustainable development. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24, S339–S343.
9. Zhang,M.H.,Mirza,J.,Malhotra,V.M.,Mechanical Properties and Frezzing and thawing durability of Polyester
Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete Incorporating Silica fume And High volumes of fly ash ,
10. Sudharsan, N, & Saravanaganesh, S. (2019). Feasibility studies on waste glass powder. International Journal of
Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 1644–1647.
11. Maurer, Dean A.; Gerald Malasheskie. “Field performance of fabrics and fibers to retard reflective cracking”
Transportation Research Record p 13-23.
12. Jiang, Yi; Rebecca S. McDaniel.“Application of Cracking and Seating and Use of Fibers to Control Reflection
Cracking.” Transportation Research Record p 150-159.
13. Mebarkia, S.; Vipulanandan, C. “Mechanical Properties and Water Diffusion in Polyester Polymer Concrete”,
Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 121, No. 12.
14. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2016). Experimental Investigations on the Properties of Coal-Ash Brick Units
as Green Building Materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 36(6), 318–325.
15. Vipulanandan, C., “Characterization of Polyester Polymer and Polymer Concrete”, Journal Materials in Civil
Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1,
16. Sudharsan, N,& Sivalingam, K. (2019). Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in
construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3435–3438.
17. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2013). Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond
ash. Pollution Research, 32(2), 405–409.