Abstract
This research examines evolving perceptions of non-traditional career paths among recent graduates and working professionals, with a focus on freelancing, dropshipping, and social media influencing. As traditional careers emphasizing job stability and hierarchical growth become less appealing, flexible and passion-driven opportunities within the digital economy are gaining prominence. A mixed-methods approach, incorporating survey data from 150 respondents and in-depth interviews, explores generational differences between individuals aged 20-30 and 31 and above. Findings reveal that 68% of participants favor non-traditional careers, driven by motivations such as work-life balance (70%), autonomy (65%), and creative freedom (60%). However, challenges persist, with income volatility (55%) and the absence of formal benefits (50%) cited as major concerns. The study highlights significant generational contrasts: younger respondents prioritize autonomy and creative freedom, while older participants weigh financial stability more heavily. Statistical analysis shows a strong correlation between autonomy-seeking behaviors and non-traditional career choices, particularly in creative fields where freelancing and influencing dominate. Conversely, business and technology graduates favor entrepreneurial models like dropshipping. Income unpredictability remains a key predictor of career dissatisfaction, underscoring the need for policy frameworks that address financial security and benefits for nontraditional workers. This research concludes that while non-traditional careers offer flexibility and personal fulfillment, long-term viability depends on sustainable support systems, including education, access to financial protections, and societal recognition. Insights from this study contribute to a broader understanding of the evolving labor market and inform strategies to better support modern career trajectories.
Keywords: Non-traditional careers, Autonomy in careers, Career perceptions, flexibility and fulfillment in careers. I. I
References
1. Acosta, I. C., and Acosta, A. S. (2017). A mixed methods study on teachers' perceptions of readiness of higher education institutions to the implementation of the K-12 curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1215-1232.
2. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., and Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.
3. Borisova, U. S., and Vasilieva, A. I. (2020). Students’ life values in the elite school “republicanlyceum-boarding school”. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 4(72), 20-23.
4. Keller, B. K., and Whiston, S. C. (2008). The role of parental influences on young adolescents’ career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 198–217.
5. Kirdök, O., and Harman, E. (2018). High school students' career decision-making difficulties according to locus of control. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 242-248.
6. Quiño, J. B. (2022). Factors influencing the career preference of senior high school students during pandemic. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 5(3), 72- 77.
7. Watts, A. G., and Kidd, J. M. (2000). Guidance in the United Kingdom: Past, present and future. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 28(4), 485-502. p- ISSN 2528-1410 e- ISSN 2527-8045 |
8. Carey , R. L., Bailey , M. J., and Polanco , C. I. (2023). How the COVID -19 pandemic shaped adolescents ’ future orientations : Insights from a global scoping review . Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101655.
9. Davis, J., Wolff, H. G., Forret, M. L., & Sullivan, S. E. (2020). Networking via LinkedIn: An examination of usage and career benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103396.
10. Graham, J.M., Faix, A. and Hartman, L. Crashing the Facebook party: one library‘s experiences in the students‘ domain. Library Review, 2009, 58(3), 228-36.
11. Haneefa, M. K. and Sumitha E. Perception and Use of Social Networking Sites by the Students of
12. Calicut University, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2011, 31(4), 295-301.
13. Montenovo, L., Jiang, X., Rojas, F. L., Schmutte, I. M., Simon, K. I., Weinberg, B. A., & Wing, C(2020). Determinants of disparities in covid-19 job losses (No. w27132). National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Gatewood, E. J. 2004. “Entrepreneurial Expectancies.” In W. B. Gartner, KG Shaver, NM Carter, & PD Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation, 153–162. London: SAGE.
15. Ghorpade, J., K. Hattrup, and J. R. Lackritz. 1999. “The Use of Personality Measures in CrossCultural Research: A Test of Three Personality Scales across Two Countries.” Journal of Applied Psychology 84(5): 670–679
16. Ilies, R., R. D. Arvey, and T. J. Bouchard. Jr. 2006. “Darwinism, Behavioral Genetics and Organizational Behavior: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(2): 121–141.
17. Kautonen, T., M. van Gelderen, and M. Fink. 2015. “Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39(3): 655–674.