Mayas Publications logo
Buy Books Buy journals

Journal Issues

Back To Archive
A Theoretical Model for Institutional Change: The Relationship between Institutional Entrepreneurship and Social Capital
Dr.M.R.Prakash
Pages: 1-5 | First Published: 05 Aug 2024
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
This investigation indicates theoretically at which level the social capital and introduced associations can be worthwhile for institutional business visionaries to achieve institutional change. Hence, a model is proposed, in perspective on three suggestions, to take a gander at the sufficiency of the social capital constrained by institutional on-screen characters to accomplish institutional change. Thusly two unmistakable fields-primarily institutional speculation and relational association theory are solidified remembering the true objective to progress explain institutional change.

References
[1] Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/421787
[2] Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: UK.
[3] Burt, R. S. (2010). Neigbour Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal. Oxford University Press
[4] DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ballinger
[5] Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 397-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004003
[6] Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an inter-organizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 454-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393153
[7] Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social netwoks and entrepreneurhip. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00029

A Study on the Design School of Strategic Management
Mrs. Pushpa A,
Pages: 6-11 | First Published: 05 Aug 2024
Full text | Abstract | Purchase | References | Request permissions

Abstract
Since its improvement in the 1960's, the field of essential organization and framework specifying has progressed into a baffling zone of concentrate, despite for the most instructed and experienced strategist. System Safari (FT Prentice Corridor, 2002), subtitled "A Guided Visit through the Wilds of Key Administration" by Henry Mintzberg, Bruce Ahlstrand and Joseph Lampel is an audit of the full field of educational and business examinations of technique definition, in light of past location course of action passed on by Mintzberg. In that book, the authors perceived ten (10) schools of framework definition. One of which is the setup school. The "design school" of imperative organization, which focuses on a non-complex model that considers the to be of essential advancement as a blueprint technique to accomplish an elegant congruity between inside undeniable ability and outside hazard and opportunity. Methodology course of action should be a discerning, easygoing and controlled technique of idea. While the model has repressions, four conditions may encourage a relationship to use the arrangement school model, including when critical learning has been developed and a situation is relentless; an affiliation can adjust to a midway articulatedphilosophy; and one individual can manage all data related with making system. There are a couple of responses of the arrangement way of thinking on its steadfastness and authenticity. The makers have offset with these responses and explained that it relies upon doubts which are misleading, as the thought caused by design school was over adjusted and limited in reason.
Keywords: Vital execution, association strategy, Administration.

References
[1] David, F.R. (1995) Strategic Management. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, London.
[2] Newman, W.H. (1953) Administrative Action. Prentice Hall, New York.
[3] Selznick, P. (1962) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Harper & Row, New York, 43-107.
[4] Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Harper & Row, New York, 62, 67-68.
[5] Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases. 8th Edition, Prentice Hall, Harlow.
[6] Matthews, H.S., Hendrickson, C. and Soh, D. (2001) The Net Effect: Environmental Implications of e-Commerce and Logistics. Proceedings of the 2001 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IIIEE) International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Denver, CO, 5-9 May 2001.
[7] Pitts, R. and Lei, D. (2006) Strategic Management. 4th Edition, Thomson South-Western.
[8] Teather, D. (2007) Challenge Amazon: Amazon Is Pretty Much the Undisputed Champion of Internet Book Sales in the UK, but Might an Ambitious New Competitor Challenge Its Market Dominance? The Book Seller.
[9] David, F.R. (1995) Strategic Management. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, London. Newman, W.H. (1953) Administrative Action. Prentice Hall, New York.
[10] Mintzberg, H., et al., (1998) Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.