Mayas Publications logo
Buy Books Buy journals

Journal Issues

Back To Archive
Digital Campaign Strategies in the 2018 Karnataka Assembly Elections
Vinod Kumar D. Chavan Assistant Professor, Indo-Asian Group of Institutions, Bangalore.
Pages: 1-7 | First Published: 05 Mar 2018
Full text | Abstract | PDF | References | Request permissions

Abstract
            The increasing influence of digital media has significantly transformed political campaigning in India. Political parties increasingly use social media platforms, online advertising, and digital communication strategies to connect with voters, disseminate political messages, and shape public opinion. The 2018 Karnataka Assembly Elections marked a significant moment in the evolution of digital political campaigning in India, as parties actively employed digital tools to engage with voters across the state. This study examines the digital campaign strategies used during the 2018 Karnataka Assembly Elections through a qualitative research approach. The research focuses on how political parties utilized social media platforms, digital communication techniques, and online engagement strategies to influence voter perception. The study relies on thematic analysis of campaign content, party communication strategies, and digital messaging used during the election period. The findings indicate that digital media played an important role in shaping political narratives, mobilizing supporters, and increasing political engagement among voters. The study highlights the growing significance of digital campaigning in contemporary electoral politics in India.

Keywords: Digital campaigning, political communication, Karnataka elections, social media, election strategy, political marketing

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  2. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  3. Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  4. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  5. Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  6. Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.

  7. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  8. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

  9. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

  10. Kietzmann, J., et al. (2011). Social media? Get serious. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.

  11. Lazer, D., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.

  12. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

  13. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  14. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. New York: Penguin Press.

  15. Pew Research Center. (2019). Social media and political engagement.

  16. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  17. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.

  18. Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  19. Thompson, J. (1995). The media and modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  20. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. New York: Basic Books.

  21. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  22. Williams, R. (2003). Television: Technology and cultural form. London: Routledge.