Abstract
This study aims to provide a thorough analysis of the influence of employee performance appraisal methods. By exploring the benefits and effects of different techniques and considering demographic factors. The method used to collect information and data to conclude is known as research methodology. The current study's investigation of the objectives is based on descriptive analysis with primary data. The primary data was gathered using a well-structured questionnaire. Simple random sampling is used for the sample survey. The sample size of this study is confined to 150 employees. An organized survey has been set up to get significant data from the respondents. Data have been analyzed using statistical tools such as one-way ANOVA test, CHI-SQUARE and CORRELATION. Finally, employee performance reveals a largely satisfied workforce with peer appraisal feedback, supervisor feedback, and performance goals that are clearly defined in the appraisal process. The rating scales generally receive positive feedback.The organization can create a more transparent, development-focused, and inclusive work environment, which will eventually improve employee performance.
Keywords:Employee performance, peer appraisal, rating scale, supervisor feedback.
Reference
1. Rakeshkumarchalla (2023), A Research Paper on „Study of Employee‟s Performance Appraisal System‟ Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research, Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August/2021, Page No: 1153 1159https://papers.ssrn.com/
2. MadhaviSripathi (2022) A Study on Employee Performance A ppraisal, JAC A Journal of Composition Theory XIV (8):44 53.
https://www.researchgate.net/
3. K. Eyoun, C. Han, A. Baker, and K. Aahed (2020), “The relationship between the purpose of performance appraisal and the psychological contract: generational differences as a moderator,” International Journal of
Hospitality Management, vol. 86, no. 102449, pp. 1 8.
4. R. A. George, A. K. George, A. K. Siti Nabiha, D. Jalaludin, and Y. A. Abdalla(2016), “Barriers to and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems of an oil and gas company,” Journal of
Cleaner Production, vol. 136, no. 8, pp. 197 212.
5. G. Walker and R. MacDonald (2018), “Designing and implementing an HR scorecard,” Human Resource Management, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 365 377.
6. X. Is lami, E. Mulolli, and N. Mustafa (2018), “Using management by objectives as a performance appraisal tool for employee satisfaction,” Future Business Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 94 108.
7. DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and perfor mance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102 (3), 421 433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085
8. Giangreco, A. Carugati, A. Sebastiano, and H. Al Tamimi (2012), “War outside, ceasefire inside: an analysis of the performance appraisal system of a public hospital in a zone of conflict,” Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 161–170.
9. Paul E. Levy (2004) The social context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and framework for the Future Journal of Psychology
10. Cohen, S. G., and Ledford, G. E., Jr.(1996 ). A prescient model of self-overseeing work groups. Human Relations, 49, 643-676. Rao, T.V. (1984), Performance Appraisal: Theory and Practice, Vikas Publishers Aima Management Series, New Delhi.s