Skip to main content


The Candor and Probity of Employer Branding Strategies and Statutory Compliance of H.R Policies in Maintaining Delighted Employees at Flipkart - A Case Study

Issue Abstract

Abstract
The employee welfare is one of the prime functions of HR Department. Employee welfare shall take care of the health, safety, and retirement benefits of the employees as per the various statutory labor legislations in India. The delighted employees will be the asset of the company. Statutory Compliances of HR policy is a must to maintain a decent branding among the competing companies to attract and retain the talented employees. There are various statutory acts defined for the benefit of employees like factories act, 1948 (Safety, Health and Sanitary facilities), the employees’ provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (Provident fund take care of family retirement benefits), OHSAS 18000 – Occupational Health and Safety Management (to take care of Health, Pollution, Hospital facilities).A company compiling with such acts will get benefited by high morale of the workers with high productivity. The company should have good employers and HR mangers to make the firm compliance with all statutory requirements. The case study is presented to indicate how the company Flipkart built its brand value in maintaining delighted employees by adopting all the statutory requirements.
Index terms: Employer Brand, Delighted Employees, Statutory Compliance, High productivity


Author Information
Puttu Guru Prasad
Issue No
6
Volume No
5
Issue Publish Date
05 Jun 2019
Issue Pages
1-7

Issue References

1. Wayne F. Cascio (2014),Leveraging employer branding, performance management and human resource development to enhance employee retention, Human Resource Development International, 17:2, 121-128, DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2014.886443.
2. Attracting and Retaining Staff: The Role of Branding and Industry Image Michelle Wallace, Ian Lings, Roslyn Cameron and Neroli Sheldon (2016).
3. Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185–206.
4. Barrow, S., & Mosley, R. (2006). The employer brand: Bringing the best of brand management to people at work. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Foster, C., & Punjaisri, K. (2010). Exploring the relationship between corporate, internal and employer branding. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(6), 401–409
6. Love, L. F., & Singh, P. (2011). Workplace branding: Leveraging human resources management practices for competitive advantage through ‘best employer’ surveys. Journal of Business & Psychology, 26(2), 175–181.
7. Gould, A.M. (2010). Working at McDonalds: Some redeeming features of McJobs. Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), 780–802. doi: 10.1177/0950017010380644.
8. Barrow, S., & Mosley, R. (2006). The employer brand: Bringing the best of brand management to people at work. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185–206.
10. A brief note on the labor legislation in India by Babu Mathew, Labor laws,(2003), The history of labor legislation in India 1-5.