Abstract
The rapid adoption of hybrid work arrangements has significantly transformed traditional employment structures, particularly in the post-pandemic period. Hybrid work, which combines remote and on-site working modes, has emerged as a strategic approach to enhance flexibility while sustaining organizational productivity. This empirical study examines work–life balance under hybrid work arrangements among employees in Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu. The study is based on primary data collected from employees engaged in hybrid work arrangements across selected organizations in Kanyakumari District. A structured questionnaire was used to gather information relating to work–life balance. The data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tools. The findings reveal that hybrid work arrangements have a significant positive influence on work–life balance, particularly by reducing commuting time, improving schedule flexibility, and enabling better integration of professional and personal responsibilities. However, the study also identifies challenges such as extended working hours, blurred work–family boundaries, and increased digital workload, which adversely affect some employees. The study concludes that while hybrid work arrangements offer considerable benefits for employees in Kanyakumari District, their effectiveness depends on supportive organizational policies, managerial trust, and clear work-time regulations.
Keywords: Hybrid, Work-Life, Employees, Flexibility, Productivity
References
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work–life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced workplace flexibility: Avoiding the traps. California Management Review, 57(4), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.5
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. Z. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
Allen, T. D. (2021). Flexible work arrangements and employee well-being: The role of hybrid work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2521
Wang, B. (2021). Achieving work–life balance in hybrid work settings. Human Resource Management Review, 31(4), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
Kumar, R., & George, S. (2022). Hybrid work culture and employee productivity in India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(3), 410–424.
Chopra, P. (2022). Work–life balance challenges in the era of hybrid employment. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 12(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v12i2.19764
Nair, S., & Thomas, J. (2023). Organizational support and work–life balance in hybrid work models. Asian Journal of Management Research, 13(1), 88–101.