Skip to main content


Specific Provisions in the International Instruments for the Protection of Child in Conflict with Law

Issue Abstract

Abstract
The domestic laws of all countries have laid down a minimum age below which a person is exempt from prosecution and punishment. The rationale for such exemption is the absence of mens rea, i.e., not to criminalize
the acts of those who at the time of commission of the crime did not know right from wrong. International instruments for the protection of children in conflict with the law emphasize the need to observe the principle of proportionality, which means that any reaction to a juvenile offender must be in proportion to his background and the nature of the crime committed. It must take into account not just the gravity of the delinquent act but also the juvenile’s profile. Juveniles enjoy all the guarantees of a fair trial just like adults. They enjoy additional- special guarantees because of their age. The Human Rights Committee has established that juveniles should enjoy at least the same guarantees and protection as adults. Procedures against juveniles must be implemented in such a way as to ensure respect for their rights and safety and must take into account their age and willingness to rehabilitate. This is meant to avoid any form of labeling the juvenile because of the criminal offense committed and give priority to the implementation of educational over punitive measures.
Keywords: Guardianship, juvenile legislation, offenders, wardship, welfarism


Author Information
Dr. N. KRISHNA KUMAR
Issue No
5
Volume No
2
Issue Publish Date
05 May 2016
Issue Pages
146-189

Issue References

Reference
1. Bartollas. Clemens and Millor, The Juvenile Offender Central, Correction and Treatment. (1978).
2. Black's Law Dictionary, West Publishing Co., 6th Edition, pg 1317.
3. Cavan, R.S., Juvenile Delinquency, (1975) Red Ed.
4. Crime in India 2004, National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
5. Don C, Gibbons, Delinquent Behavioural(3rd Edition).
6. Dr.VedKumari, “Relevant date for applying the Juvenile Justice Act” (2000) 6 SCC (Jour) 9.
7. Eaton, J. W. and Polk, K., Measuring Delinquency. Pittsburg; University Pittsburg Press,1961.
8. Hirsh, N., Dynamic Causes of Juvenile Crime. Cambridge; Mass, Sci-Art Publisher, 1937.
9. K. Kusum, 'Juvenile Delinquency- A Socio-legal Study'(1979) Published by KLM Book House, New Delhi.
10. Ruth Shonle Cavan Theodore N. Ferdinand, Juvenile Delinquency (III Edition).
11. Sellin, T. and Wolfgang, M., The Measurement of Delinquency. New York; John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1964.
12. The new politics of crime and punishment, edited by Roger Mathews &Jock Young, Willan publishing.