Abstract
Fiber Reinforcement Polymer (FRP) composites are commonly used for helper, present day and bio-clinical applications due to their assurance from utilization, high solidarity to weight extents, the ability to manage with no issue. FRP sandwich sheets are considered for the current assessment, focused in on the preliminary and consistent assessments of FRP sandwich sheets particularly with respect to stack passing on limit under tension and strain, and strategy for frustration. In the essential time of this assessment, the going with starter considers are made, Experimental examination of loads up under strain and pressure and their capacities. Further, these examinations are upgraded through test showing and assessment of FRP sandwich sheets made by implantation measure and the results will be utilized for extra proposition.
Keywords: Fiber Reinforcement Polymer (FRP); polyurethane foam (PU foam); Experimental assessment; Analytical examination.
References
1. Amir Fam, Tarek Sharaf (2010), ‘Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising of polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations, composites part B, vol:92, pp.2927-2935.
2. C.Manalo,T.Aravindhan, W.Karunasena .(2009), Flexural behavior of structural fibre composite sandwich beams in flatwise and edgewise position’ composites structures , vol:92,pp.984-995.
3. Hesham Tuwair, Jeffery volz, Mohammed A.Elgawady (2015), Testing and evaluation of polyurethane-based GRFP sandwich bridge deck panels with polyurethane foam core’ American Society of Civil Engineers,No.1061.
4. Heshan, (2015), „Evaluation of sandwich panels with various polyurethane foam core and ribs‟, composites part B,vol:79,pp.262-276.
5. Julio F.Davalos,Pizhong Qiao,x.Frank xu, Justin (2011), Molding and characterization of fibre –reinforced plastic honeycomb sandwich panel for highway bridge application‟ composite structures, vol:52,pp.441-442.
6. M.Dawood, W.Ballew, J.Seiter (2011), ‟Enhancing resistance of composite sandwich panel to localized forces for civil infrastructure and transportation and applications‟, composite structures, vol:93, pp.2983-2991.
7. M.Dawood,E.Taylor,w.Ballew, S.Rizkalla (2010),‟Static and fatique bending behavior of pultruded GFRP sandwich panels with through thickness fibre insertion. Composites part B, vol:41, pp.363-374.
8. Mohammed,A.Mousa, Nasim Uddin (2009), Experimental and analytical study of carbon fibre reinforced polymer/ autoclaved aerated concrete sandwich panels, Engineering structures, vol:31, pp.2337-2344.
9. Sourabha, S.Havaldar, Ramesh S.Sharma. (2013), Experimental investigation of dynamic characteristics of multilayer PU foam sandwich panels‟, Journals of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, vol:1,pp.201-206.
10. Zhimin Wu, Weiqing , Liu, Lu Wang, Haifang , David Hul(2014), Theoretical and experimental study of foam-filled lattice composite panels under quasi static compression loading‟, composites part B , vol:60, pp.329-340. 11. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2013). Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond ash. Pollution Research, 32(2), 405–409.
12. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2014). Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall elements. Journal of Structural Engineering (India), 41(4), 410–419.
13. Vidhya, K., & Kandasamy, S. (2016). Experimental Investigations on the Properties of Coal-Ash Brick Units as Green Building Materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 36(6), 318–325.
14. Sudharsan, N, & Saravanaganesh, S. (2019). Feasibility studies on waste glass powder. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 1644–1647.
15. Sudharsan, N,& Sivalingam, K. (2019). Potential utilization of waste material for sustainable development in construction industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3435–3438.
16. Sudharsan, N., & Palanisamy, T. (2018). A comprehensive study on potential use of waste materials in brick for sustainable development. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 24, S339–S343.