Dimension of Tribal Development Learning Process at Grass Root Level

Abstract
The presence of tribal and non-tribal reflect the heterogeneous character of India economy of the Indian economy, while the tribal represent the traditional, conservation, and isolated group of people living in mounting and terrains, and the nontribal represents the aspiration for faster change and modernization. The gap between these two groups of people has been expanding ever since the development programs have been implemented. The characteristics of the tribal economy are described as forest-based. Family as a unit of production, consumption, and pattern of labor, periodical local market, and interdependence.

References

1. Hamumantha Rajappa (1993) Issue in Tribal Development, Journal of Rural Development, Vol.18, Issue no.2.
2. Meen Radhakrishnan (2009), Starvation Among Primitive Tribal Groups, Economic Political Weekly, Vol.XLIV, No.18.
3. Nagada B.L (1998), Rajasthan – tribal Population and Development Scenario, Kurukshetra, Vol.39.
4. Nagaraju G.H. (2013), Socio–Economic Infrastructural Characteristic Sticks of Tribal Farmers in Karnataka a Case Study of Chamaraja, Southern Economics, Vol. No.51, No.18.
5. Purshottam Lal (2013) The tribal Culture, Yojana, Vol.39.
6. Roy Burman B.K, (2006) Draft National Tribal Policy of 2006 creating Consternation, Economic Political Weekly, Vol. Xl.34,p.36-45.
7. Sanjay Kumar Pradhan (2010), Problems of Tribal Development Education in India a Microscopic Analysis, Kurukshetra, Vol-58.
8. Tankesh Joshi and Muktesh Joshi, (2007) Myths about tribal Women’s Health in Bastar, Kurukshetra, Vol-59,p-42.
9. Virginias (1999), Transformation Tribes in India Terms Discourse, Economic Political Weekly, Vol. No.XXX, No.24.
10. www.Tamil Nadu e-source.com.