Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare, exemplified by Google Medical, presents a paradoxical landscape of both ethical challenges and unprecedented opportunities. This paper exploresthe intricate interplay between AI and medical practice, with a focus on Google's foray into this domain. While AI holds immense promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, streamlining processes, and improving treatment outcomes, it also raises profound ethical concerns that demand rigorous scrutiny.This study explores the ethical challenges arising from the use of AI in Google Medical. Issues related to data privacy, informed consent, and algorithmic transparency take centre stage as AI systems process vast amounts of sensitive patient information. Moreover, the potential for bias amplification and exacerbation of health disparities calls for vigilant oversight and algorithmic fairness. The transformative potential of AI must be balanced against the risks of unintended consequences and elimination of humanin medical decision-making. Amidst these challenges, there are remarkable opportunities to harness AI's capabilities responsibly. Collaboration between AI and medical experts can augment clinical judgment, enabling earlier disease detection, personalized treatment plans, and improved patient management. Ethical frameworks, such as explainable AI and robust data governance, offer avenues to navigate the ethical complexities. Google Medical, as an exemplar, can lead the way in developing transparent and accountable AI solutions that prioritize patient welfare. In conclusion, the paradoxes inherent in the connection of AI and healthcare within the context of Google Medical encapsulate a vital moment in medical history. While ethical challenges loom large, they are accompanied by a unique chance to redefine healthcare delivery. By addressing the ethical concerns head-on, embracing interdisciplinary collaboration, and upholding patient-centric principles, AI-driven healthcare innovations have the potential to revolutionize medical practice, yielding a future that harmonizes technological advancement with ethical integrity
References
1. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.
2. Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115-118.
3. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
4. Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., ... & Zhang, M. (2018). Scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health records. npj Digital Medicine, 1(1), 1-10.
5. Li, M., Zhang, J., Danhof, C., Li, X., & Zhang, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence for drug discovery and development: Applications, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 97, 12-32.
6. Angermueller, C., Pärnamaa, T., Parts, L., &Stegle, O. (2020). Deep learning for computational biology. Molecular Systems Biology, 16(12), e9390.
7. Chen, Q., Allotey, P. A., Pei, Y., & Pan, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 4(3), 143-145.
8. Panch, T., Mattie, H., & Celi, L. A. (2018). The "inconvenient truth" about AI in healthcare. NPJ digital medicine, 1(1), 1-4.
9. Cohen, G. N., Beaufils, B., & Wyatt, J. C. (2020). Telemedicine and the rise of digital medicine. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3), e16861.
10. Sundararajan, R., Heng, J. Y., & Jun, C. X. (2018). The role of artificial intelligence in medical imaging in Asia. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 22(1), 4-7.
11. Hulme, S. A., Hammerla, N., Ploetz, T., & Olivier, P. (2019). Use of Wearable Devices for Post-Discharge Monitoring of Rural Patients With Heart Failure. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).
12. Labrique, A. B., Vasudevan, L., Chang, L. W., Mehl, G., &H_pe, K. (2017). Digital health and health systems of the future. Global Health: Science and Practice, 5(1), 1-3.
13. Dugas, M., Lange, M., Ghassemi, M., &Mayaud, L. (2019). Improving clinical practice using artificial intelligence and machine learning. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(8), e355-e357.
14. Hassanpour, K., Gagne, N. W., Xu, C., & Bui, A. A. (2020). Medical image interpretation with deep learning: A review. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 4(1), 42-73.
15. Haidegger, T., Sándor, J., &Benyó, Z. (2018). Surgical robots and robotic surgery: past, present, and future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 146-152.
16. Liu, X., Chen, H., & Lim, E. P. (2019). Artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: A guide for authors and reviewers. Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 34(3), 154-158.
17. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215.
18. Mazurek, M., Borycki, E., & Purkis, M. E. (2020). An exploration of health data interoperability approaches for electronic health records. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 4(4), 283-311
19. https://health.google