Skip to main content


Assessment and Assortment of Projects Using Hybrid Mcdm Technique Under Fuzzy Environment Based on Economic Factors

Issue Abstract

Abstract
Selection of project among a set of possible investment alternatives is a tough task that the decision maker (DM) has to face. For evaluation and selection of these projects, a set of six factors, i.e. Net present value, Rate of return, Benefit cost analysis, Payback period, investment size and Time until breakeven are considered. The objective of this work is to demonstrate the methodology of evaluating and selecting the best project by using hybrid multi criteria decision making technique (MCDM), i.e., fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (Fuzzy AHP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS). The criteria weights are calculated by using Fuzzy AHP whereas the global weights of all five projects(Investment alternatives) are computed based on Fuzzy TOPSIS. Finally, from the findings of this work, the projects are ranked from most important to least important.
Keywords: Investment alternatives, Fuzzy Theory, Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS


Author Information
S.Umamageswari Ph.D. Research Scholar,Dr. M. Balasubramanian Research Advisor & Assistant Professor PG & Research Department of Commerce Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu
Issue No
2
Volume No
5
Issue Publish Date
05 Feb 2025
Issue Pages
266-276

Issue References

REFERENCES
1. Önüt, S., Soner Kara, S., & Efendigil, T. (2008). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM
approach to machine tool selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4),
443-453.
2. Archer, N. P., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An integrated framework for project
portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207-216.
3. Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, M. S. (2007). Project
selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. World Academy of Science,
Engineering and Technology, 30, 333-338.
4. Salehi, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2008). Project selection by using a
fuzzy TOPSIS technique.
5. Meredith, J. R., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2011). Project management: a managerial
approach. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Trigeorgis, L. (1993). Real options and interactions with financial flexibility.
Financial management, 202-224.
7. Mara, D. D., & Cairncross, S. (1989). Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater
and excreta in agriculture and aquaculture: measures for public health protection.
8. Amiri, M. P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the
AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6218-
6224.
9. Dey, P. K., & Ramcharan, E. K. (2008). Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados. Journal of Environmental management, 88(4), 1384-1395.
10. Dey, P. K. (2006). Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 90-103.