Abstract
Understanding a particular customers product needs, likes, and dislikes and to make an automation based on it is a very convolute job. This project augments heuristic-driven user interest profiling with reviewer credibility analysis and fine-grained feature sentiment analysis to conceive a vigorous recommendation methodology. The proposed credibility, interest and sentiment enhanced recommendation (CISER) model has five modules: candidate, feature extraction, reviewer credibility analysis, user interest mining, candidate feature sentiment assignment, and recommendation module. Review corpus is given as an input. The first module uses context and sentiment confidence to procure useful, crucial features.To detect the untrustworthy reviews and reviewers, reviewer credibility analysis proffers an approach to weigh reviews according to the parameters of credibility. The user interest mining module, uses fairness of review writing as heuristics for interest-pattern mining. The candidate feature sentiment assignment module comparesexisting features in review based on their fast Text sentiment polarity. The final module uses credible sentiment scoring for purchase recommendations. The proposed recommendation modelutilizes not only numeric reviewsbut also uses sentiment expressions connected with components, customer preference profiles, and reviewer credibility for quantitative analysis of various alternative products. The mean average precision (MAP@1) for CISER is 93%, and MAP@3 is 49%, which is better than current state-of-the-art systems.
Keywords: Recommendation system, sentiment analysis, user credibility, user interest.
References
1. J. A. Konstan and J. Riedl, ‘‘Recommender systems: From algorithms to user experience,’’ User Model. User-Adapted Interact., vol. 22, nos. 1–2, pp. 101–123, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11257-011-9112-x.
2. J. B. Schafer, D. Frankowski, J. Herlocker, and S. Sen, ‘‘Collaborative filtering recommender systems,’’ in The Adaptive Web (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 4321, P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2007.
3. M. J. Pazzani and D. Billsus, ‘‘Content-based recommendation systems,’’ in The Adaptive Web (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 4321, P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007.
4. S.-T. Li, T.-T. Pham, and H.-C. Chuang, ‘‘Do reviewers’ words affect predicting their helpfulness ratings? Locating helpful reviewers by linguistics styles,’’ Inf. Manage., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2019.
5. V. Srivastava and A. D. Kalro, ‘‘Enhancing the helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of latent (content) factors,’’ J. Interact. Marketing, vol. 48, pp. 33–50, Nov. 2019.
6. B. Liu, Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. San Mateo, CA, USA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.
7. [Amazon Web services, inc. Amazon Customer Reviews Datase. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://s3.amazonaws.com/amazonreviews-pds/readme.html
8. S. Raza and C. Ding, ‘‘Progress in context-aware recommender systems—An overview,’’ Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 31, pp. 84–97, Feb. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1574013718302120
9. L. Chen, G. Chen, and F. Wang, ‘‘Recommender systems based on user reviews: The state of the art,’’ User Model. User-Adapted Interact., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 99–154, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11257-015-9155-5.
10. C. He, D. Parra, and K. Verbert, ‘‘Interactive recommender systems: A survey of the state of the art and future research challenges and opportunities,’’ Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 56, pp. 9–27, Sep. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0957417416300367
11. S. Reddy, S. Nalluri, S. Kunisetti, S. Ashok, and B. Venkatesh, ‘‘Contentbased movie recommendation system using genre correlation,’’ in Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications, S. C. Satapathy, V. Bhateja, and S. Das, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 391–397.
12. X. Li, W. Jiang, W. Chen, J. Wu, and G. Wang, ‘‘Haes: A new hybrid approach for movie recommendation with elastic serendipity,’’ in Proc. 28th ACM Int. Conf. Inf. Knowl. Manage., New York, NY, USA, 2019, pp. 1503–1512, doi: 10.1145/3357384.3357868.
13. K. Benzi, V. Kalofolias, X. Bresson, and P. Vandergheynst, ‘‘Song recommendation with non-negative matrix
factorization and graph total variation,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), Mar. 2016, pp. 2439–2443.
14. P. Covington, J. Adams, and E. Sargin, ‘‘Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations,’’ in Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Recommender Syst., New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 191–198, doi: 10.1145/2959100.2959190.
15. J. Guerreiro and P. Rita, ‘‘How to predict explicit recommendations in online reviews using text mining and sentiment analysis,’’ J. Hospitality Tourism Manage., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.07.001.
16. M. Chelliah and S. Sarkar, ‘‘Product recommendations enhanced with reviews,’’ in Proc. Eleventh ACM Conf. Recommender Syst., New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 398–399, doi: 10.1145/3109859.3109936.
17. L. S. Gallege and R. R. Raje, ‘‘Towards selecting and recommending online software services by evaluating external attributes,’’ in Proc. 11th Annu. Cyber Inf. Secur. Res.Conf. (CISRC), 2016, p. 23.
18. Y. Qian, Y. Zhang, X. Ma, H. Yu, and L. Peng, ‘‘EARS: Emotionaware recommender system based on hybrid information fusion,’’ Inf. Fusion, vol. 46, pp. 141–146, Mar. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253518301234
19. A. Da’u and N. Salim, ‘‘Sentiment-Aware Deep Recommender System With Neural Attention Networks,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 45472–45484, 2019.
20. A. Said, E. W. De Luca, and S. Albayrak, ‘‘Inferring contextual user profiles-improving recommender performance,’’ in Proc. 3rd RecSys Workshop Context-Aware Recommender Syst., Chicago, IL, USA, 2011.
21. F. García-Sánchez, R. Colomo-Palacios, and R. Valencia-García, ‘‘A social-semantic recommender system for advertisements,’’ Inf. Process. Manage., vol. 57, no. 2, Mar. 2020, Art. no. 102153.
22. J. Wei, F. Meng, and N. Arunkumar, ‘‘A personalized authoritative user-based recommendation for social tagging,’’ Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 86, pp. 355–361, Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available:
23. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X18303078
M. Xu and S. Liu, ‘‘Semantic-enhanced and context-aware hybrid collaborative filtering for event recommendation in event-based social networks,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 17493–17502, 2019.
24. L. U, Y. Chai, and J. Chen, ‘‘Improved personalized recommendation based on user attributes clustering and score matrix filling,’’ Comput. Standards Inter., vol. 57, pp. 59–67, Mar. 2018.
25. K. Xu, X. Zheng, Y. Cai, H. Min, Z. Gao, B. Zhu, H. Xie, and T.-L. Wong, ‘‘Improving user recommendation by extracting social topics and interest topics of users in uni-directional social networks,’’ Knowl.- Based Syst., vol. 140, pp. 120–133, Jan. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705117305002
26. R. Logesh, V. Subramaniyaswamy, V. Vijayakumar, and X. Li, ‘‘Efficient User Profiling Based Intelligent Travel Recommender System for Individual and Group of Users,’’ Mobile Netw. Appl., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1018–1033, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11036-018-1059-2.
27. J. Li, W. Xu, W. Wan, and J. Sun, ‘‘Movie recommendation based on bridging movie feature and userinterest,’’ J. Comput. Sci., vol. 26, pp. 128–134, May 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750318300012
28. H. Tahmasbi, M. Jalali, and H. Shakeri, ‘‘Modeling Temporal Dynamics of User Preferences in Movie Recommendation,’’ in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Comput. Knowl. Eng. (ICCKE), Oct. 2018, pp. 194–199.
29. S. E. Middleton, D. C. De Roure, and N. R. Shadbolt, ‘‘Capturing knowledge of user preferences: Ontologies in recommender systems,’’ in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Knowl. Capture, New York, NY, USA, 2001, pp. 100–107,
doi: 10.1145/500737.500755. VOLUME 8, 2020 26187 S. Hu et al.: Reviewer Credibility and Sentiment Analysis Based User Profile Modelling for Online Product Recommendation
30. X. Xie and B. Wang, ‘‘Web page recommendation via twofold clustering: Considering user behavior and topic relation,’’ Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 235–243, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2444-z.
31. J. Al-Sharawneh and M.-A. Williams, ‘‘Credibility-based social network recommendation: Follow the leader,’’ in Proc. 21st Australas. Conf. Inf. Syst., 2010, pp. 1–11.
32. D. Goldbaum, ‘‘Follow the leader: Simulations on a dynamic social network,’’ UTS Finance Econ. Work. Paper No 155, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.business.uts.edu.au/finance/research/wpapers/wp155.pdf
33. F. Li and T. C. Du, ‘‘Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs,’’ Decis. Support Syst., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 190–197, Apr. 2011.
34. J. Chen, C. Wang, Q. Shi, Y. Feng, and C. Chen, ‘‘Social recommendation based on users’ attention and preference,’’ Neurocomputing, vol. 341, pp. 1–9, May 2019. [Online]. Available:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231219302693
35. A. Kumar and G. Garg, ‘‘Sentiment analysis of multimodal Twitter data,’’ Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 78, no. 17, pp. 24103–24119, Sep. 2019.
36. [A. Kumar and A. Jaiswal, ‘‘Particle swarm optimized ensemble learning for enhanced predictive sentiment accuracy of tweets,’’ in Proc. ICETIT, P. K. Singh, B. K. Panigrahi, N. K. Suryadevara, S. K. Sharma, and A. P. Singh, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, pp. 633–646.
37. A. Kumar and A. Joshi, ‘‘Ontology driven sentiment analysis on social Web for government intelligence,’’ in Proc. Special Collection EGovernment Innov. India, New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 134–139, doi: 10.1145/3055219.3055229.
38. A. Kumar and A. Jaiswal, ‘‘Empirical study of twitter and tumblr for sentiment analysis using soft computing techniques,’’ in Proc. World Congr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, 2017, pp. 1–5.
39. H. H. Do, P. Prasad, A. Maag, and A. Alsadoon, ‘‘Deep Learning for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Review,’’ Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 118, pp. 272–299, Mar. 2019. [Online]. Available:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417418306456
40. A. Dridi, M. Atzeni, and D. ReforgiatoRecupero, ‘‘FineNews: Finegrained semantic sentiment analysis on financial microblogs and news,’’ Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyber., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2199–2207, Aug. 2019,
doi: 10.1007/s13042-018-0805-x.
41. R. Dong, M. P. O’Mahony, M. Schaal, K. Mccarthy, and B. Smyth, ‘‘Combining similarity and sentiment in opinion mining for product recommendation,’’ J. Intell. Inf. Syst., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 285–312, Apr. 2016,
doi: 10.1007/s10844-015-0379-y.
42. G. Liu, Y. Wang, and M. Orgun, ‘‘Trust inference in complex trust-oriented social networks,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 4, Aug. 2009, pp. 996–1001.
43. M. J. Metzger, ‘‘Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research,’’ J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., vol. 58, no. 13, pp. 2078–2091, Nov. 2007.
44. K. Kwon, J. Cho, and Y. Park, ‘‘Multidimensional credibility model for neighbor selection in collaborative recommendation,’’ Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 7114–7122, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.071.
45. T. H. Haveliwala, ‘‘Topic-sensitive pagerank,’’ in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp. 517–526, doi: 10.1145/511446.511513.
46. R. Mihalcea and P. Tarau, ‘‘Textrank: Bringing order into text,’’ in Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Lang. Process., 2004, pp. 404–411.
47. S. Rose, D. Engel, N. Cramer, and W. Cowley, ‘‘Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents,’’ Text Mining: Appl. Theory, vol. 1, pp. 1–20, Mar. 2010 Jaganathan, M., Sabari, A. An heuristic cloud based segmentation technique using edge and texture based two dimensional entropy. Cluster Computing Vol 22, PP 12767–12776(2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1757-3
48. S.B. Jayabharathi, S. Manjula, E. Tamil Selvan, P. Vengatesh and V. Senthil Kumar” Semantic Risk Analysis Model Cancer Data Prediction” Journal on Science Engineering and Technology Vo1ume 5, No. 02, April 2018
49. V.Senthilkumar , K.Prashanth” A Survey of Rendezvous planning Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks International Journal of communication and computer Technologies, Vol 4 Issue No 1 (2016)
50. Sowmitha, V., and Mr V. Senthilkumar. "A Cluster Based Weighted Rendezvous Planning for Efficient Mobile-Sink Path Selection in WSN." International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol 2 Issue 11 2015
51. Viswanathan, A., Arunachalam, V. P., & Karthik, S. (2012). Geographical division traceback for distributed denial of service. Journal of Computer Science, 8(2), 216.
52. Anurekha, R., K. Duraiswamy, A. Viswanathan, V.P. Arunachalam and K.G. Kumar et al., 2012. Dynamic approach to defend against distributed denial of service attacks using an adaptive spin lock rate control mechanism. J. Comput. Sci., 8: 632-636.
53. Umamaheswari, M., & Rengarajan, N. (2020). Intelligent exhaustion rate and stability control on underwater wsn with fuzzy based clustering for efficient cost management strategies. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 18(3), 283-294.
54. Babu, G., & Maheswari, M. U. (2014). Bandwidth Scheduling for Content Delivery in VANET. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering IJIRCCE, 2(1), 1000-1007.
55. Viswanathan, A., Kannan, A. R., & Kumar, K. G. (2010). A Dynamic Approach to defend against anonymous DDoS flooding Attacks. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Security.
56. Kalaivani, R., & Viswanathan, A. HYBRID CLOUD SERVICE COMPOSITION MECHANISM WITH SECURITY AND PRIVACY FOR BIG DATA PROCESS., International Journal of Advanced Research in Biology Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2,Special Issue 10, ISSN 2395-695X.
57. Ardra, S., & Viswanathan, A. (2012). A Survey On Detection And Mitigation Of Misbehavior In Disruption Tolerant Networks. IRACST-International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications (IJCNWC), 2(6).