Abstract
This study examines the interrelationships between environmental sustainability efforts (ESE), corporate social practices (CSP), lack of awareness barriers (LAS), and employee performance (EP). The research is based on a dataset of 57 valid responses, with no missing values, ensuring methodological reliability. Descriptive statistics reveal strong agreement with sustainability practices such as community development initiatives (M = 4.33) and reducing environmental pollution (M = 4.30). Ethical practices, including fair wages and safe working conditions, also scored highly (M = 4.23). Conversely, green innovation practices to reduce environmental impact showed limited adoption (M = 2.57). Standard deviations around 1.0 indicate moderate variability in responses. High kurtosis values suggest clustering of responses at the higher end, reflecting strong consensus on sustainability practices. Crosstabulation analysis highlights a gender imbalance, as all respondents were male. Age distribution shows 21 respondents below 25 years and 36 between 25–35 years. Educational qualifications varied, with undergraduate degrees being most common (n = 18). Income distribution indicates 23 respondents earning 1–3 lakhs, 18 earning 3–5 lakhs, and 16 earning above 5 lakhs annually. Younger respondents were concentrated in lower education and income categories, while older respondents showed greater diversity. Correlation analysis demonstrates strong positive relationships among all four constructs. EP correlates significantly with ESE (r = .718, p < .01), confirming that sustainability enhances workforce outcomes. EP also correlates with CSP (r = .754, p < .01), indicating that socially responsible practices improve performance.
study-practices
References
1. Dean, T. J., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The role of entrepreneurship in sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.002 2. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing. 3. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing. 4. Ike, D. (2025). Sustainable entrepreneurship in emergence: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Development, 33(S1), 1200–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70058 5. Kononova, N., Juraschek, M., Franzè, C., Behrend, C., Agirre, J., Revilla, O., Ventura Silva, G., & Herrmann, C. (2025). From goals to actions: Insights on how European SMEs plan and implement sustainability projects. Procedia CIRP, 135, 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.069 6. Naranjo, I., de la Torre, R., & Boza, A. (2025). Sustainable decision-making in SMEs of the textile industry: Integrating methodologies, practices, and barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34, 6385–6441. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4295 7. Sathish, A., & Rajamohan, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial strategies of MSME for the sustainable development in India. Science, Technology and Development, 8(12), 310–322. 8. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 9. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda 10. Verma, T. L., & Nema, P. (2019). Role of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in achieving sustainable development goals. International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management, 4(12), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.18231/2454-9150.2019.0189
Author information
A. Banupriya
Assistant Professor & Research Scholar, Hindustan College, Mysuru.
Dr. K. Sridevi
Assistant Professor, HITS.